Conveying product

Aqueous Ammonia

Key specifications

High level of maintenance
Increased safety risks
High costs for parts and maintenance time

Cost savings

Lower total cost of ownership
Increased safety
100% reduction in maintenance
Increased energy savings
No additional equipment needed
Increased reliability

Pump type


Do you ever find yourself doing the same thing over and over again because that is the way “it has always been done?” Knowing there could be a better way to accomplish what you need to, but the risk of trying something else and potentially failing seems so high? Yet knowing a better way could be highly advantageous? That’s the scenario one generating station Maintenance Manager found himself in when handling reoccurring maintenance issues with diaphragm pumps.


The Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation (AECC) Magnet Cove Generating Station was experiencing a high level of maintenance with their Neptune diaphragm metering pumps. These pumps were part of the plant’s selective catalytic reduction (SCR) process. A solution of 29% aqueous ammonia and 71% water was being injected into the system to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions.

This process takes place in the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) and is crucial to the operation of the plant. The hot gasses being discharged into the atmosphere from the HRSG must meet government regulations in regards to NOx emissions for public safety. If the SCR process malfunctions, the entire system has to be shut down and no power can be generated.


The high level of maintenance required by the diaphragm pumps was not only costly, but a safety hazard to the maintenance crew. Anytime you are around aqueous ammonia, you have to take precautions and there is a safety risk. The maintenance crew was spending approximately 16 hours a month working on these pumps and around the aqueous ammonia solution.

We would have to rebuild each of the pumps once a year. This was a huge expense at $1,500-$2,000 in parts alone, plus the maintenance time. We were replacing the bladders three times a year at $500 each as well. Operators and maintenance personnel were constantly in the pit having to make adjustments to the old diaphragm pumps. This was a huge safety risk. Joey Vanmeter
Maintenance Supervisor at AECC


Caleb Carter, Sales Engineer, with Tencarva Machinery Company, a SEEPEX distributor, was responsible for calling on the Magnet Cove Generating Station. Caleb learned of the high maintenance level the diaphragm metering pumps were requiring and suggested Joey look into a progressive cavity metering pump through SEEPEX.

Joey was familiar with progressive cavity pumps working well in oil applications, but was hesitant to switch to a different product for such a critical process. Diaphragm metering pumps are the most commonly utilized pump for this application in the generating plant world. Switching to something different would be a huge risk to go outside the “norm.”

Joey also knew he had to have a pump that could handle a range in suction pressures, specifically down to low levels. Within the SCR process, valves open and close on demand, varying the flow rate, and therefore varying the amount of pressure in the piping. Aqueous ammonia, chemical name ammonium hydroxide, begins vaporizing at approximately 85°F. This change from a liquid state to a gaseous vapor results in a change in pressure as well. These two factors along with the installation being outside and varying high summer temperatures means the net positive suction head available (NPSHa) can dramatically decrease. A pump with a low net

NPSH is the difference between suction pressure and vapor pressure. Net positive suction head available (NPSHa) and net positive suction head required (NPSHr) are critical to understanding if the system is designed correctly and the pump selected is the correct style for the system. NPSHa refers to how much pressure the system has available for the pump to use and NPSHr is the minimum amount of pressure the pump can operate without cavitation. NPSHa must always be greater than NPSHr.

SEEPEX progressive cavity pumps have a low NPSHr and therefore are a solution for this type of application. The unique design of the interference fit between the rotor and stator allows for the low NPSHr. A pump with a high NPSHr and not enough NPSHa would cavitate and ultimately fail.

Joey continued his research and spoke with a manager at a water treatment facility in Florida utilizing SEEPEX metering pumps on a solution of bleach and 19% aqueous ammonia. The reference spoke highly of the SEEPEX pumps; how great they worked, the low maintenance, and the fact they don’t run dry. He couldn’t say enough good things about them.

After hearing this positive feedback from an end user, Joey decided to move forward with the purchase of a SEEPEX MD 05-6LT metering pump to utilize as a trial. The pump was installed temporarily to ensure it would work before taking out the old Neptune diaphragm pumps. This was a big change in the thought process for this application and inherently had some risk. If the SEEPEX metering pump had failed on this critical application, Joey needed the redundancy of the installed Neptune diaphragm pumps to insure he would be able to get the system up and running.

The SEEPEX metering pump had no problems during the trial installation and was later installed permanently along with two more that replaced the three previously utilized Neptune diaphragm metering pumps. Since installation, Joey has had nothing but praises for SEEPEX.


The SEEPEX metering pumps have been installed since April/May of 2019 and have required no maintenance. This has made Joey quite happy; a 100% reduction in maintenance and an elimination of a large safety risk for his crew.

The energy savings has been welcomed as well. The SCR system that controls the NOx emissions now runs on one SEEPEX metering pump instead of three Neptune diaphragm pumps.

Overall, Joey is glad they stepped outside the “norm” for their industry and went with a SEEPEX metering pump.

The reliability has been great. The upfront costs and maintenance costs are less, they work, no pulsation dampeners are required, we are saving energy, and the safety benefits are all positives. We had to change our mindset, but it was an all-around gain. Joey Vanmeter
AECC Maintenance Supervisor

Need additional information?